- Joined
- Feb 3, 2022
- Messages
- 5,691
- Reaction score
- 4,461
For anyone who's committed themselves, what's the gist of the above essay?
For anyone who's committed themselves, what's the gist of the above essay?
Great bit of scripture there all right. Great big words too.On the topic of the sovereign person, this is something that in our culture (meaning the Irish) was entirely assumed with contrary examples treated as strange aberrations. Eccentricity was quite common and natural within our society but this eccentricity was accepted and enjoyed as evidence of personal sovereignty and the variety of Creation. Now, the proper definition of the above sovereignty is difficult to describe but I will make some effort at it.
One of the attributes was the responsibility of oneself to oneself to align with the natural harmonic of one's life. With this came the consequent free decision making power over life choices (such as marriage) and the right to just ambition (such as free employment). Situations which violate it are invalid and hold only coercive power.
The natural response of such a belief in personal sovereignty in one's meeting of another person was the conclusion that there was an equivalent entity looking back at you through the other's eyes. That entity may have different characteristics, experience and talents but retains their equivalence nonetheless and should be taken seriously. This attitude is borne in a society of free people.
Within societies where master/slave dominance relationships predominated there were gradations of dignity with the casual instrumentalisation of lower grades (terrible losses at the front? press-gang more scrotes!) - however with the advent of the Christian ethos, and later that of Liberal politics (in the classical sense), this changed, in iterations over some centuries, finally being more or less culturally ensconced as the modus vivendi in the Western influenced world system by the C20th. While the claim to personal sovereignty was made evident through the revelation of the soul, enculturated through the activity of the faithful, and forwarded through the organisational structure by rational interest, it is commonly recently made via absolutist claim.
This is the fundamental argument made by those who wish to incongruently "flash the ROM" and convert themselves into something quite contrary to what they are. Which brings us to the question, by way of explanation, of the prohibition of certain categories of drugs.
Why can't someone "harmonise" with cocaine, heroine or fentanyl? The "libertarian" argument is that as long as they are not affecting other people there is no jurisdiction of the state over them. Now this rule of thumb, in fact, is how life is generally lived, and was always lived, in this country. While the squinting windows were always a nuisance (being punishable by the forfeiture of a number of cattle as far back as Brehon law) there was the usual Irish solution to an Irish problem approach to the application of state power. The rise of the use of novel drugs (that only made an appearance from the late mid C20th) presented a problem with this accommodation.
So why are addictive drugs abhorrent? The answer lies in their function as enslavement tools. The drug - such as heroin - is not so much a commodity like sugar as an instrument of control which enable the suppliers to engage a cohort of users in begging, stealing and extorting money for them. To become a drug addict is to lose one's personal sovereignty - something that is repugnant to the instantiated culture. How facile the addiction, in addition to its depth and effects, is an important factor in its actionability here.
While the addict retains a semblance of their former self, it is the addiction that is determinate. Now, while it possible for the remnant to recover control over their personality, methods of doing this are imperfect and losses predominate. Furthermore, the addictive portion's primary mechanism is to use the remnant as a cloak to conceal its action, thus caution has to be vigilantly exercised during any engagement. Certainly those that have succeeded are to be celebrated but it taints their lives. It is this taint, in addition to the casualty rate, that justifies intervention by the state to combat its proliferation - there is a public interest in combating the inculcation of a slave culture into a free people.
A group intelligence is something we are all intimately familiar with - it is the knowledge of means and things we receive as well as a guide to the way we go about things.
For example, there is a way to successfully behave when one is in the swimming pool. We can be experienced pool goers or novice ones. There are things that are best suited to use there and behaviours that facilitate our having a good pool visit. There are ways to swim that are not merely randomly selected but rather are objectively the successful methods to swim strongly rather than drown. Skill levels do not always produce faster results than strength levels in different physiologies but are to be prized nonetheless. Furthermore, for a swimming pool to exist (and be a facility for us) everyone has to interact harmoniously and work together to make it work - there are roles appropriate to its organisation and to its participants. We may take it for granted but a swimming pool open to the public is a wonder of progress and has degrees of intricacy that are sensitive to challenges of operation, safety, cleanliness, instruction, privacy etc. There are different successful ways to instantiate a swimming pool that may differ slightly but on the whole concur with each other and, indeed, there is probably a way that excels achieved through particular expertise. A chaotic swimming pool may persist for a while as it erodes but it will inevitably wind down and become inoperable - the world we inhabit is not quantum.
Similarly, there are group intelligences active (examples include physics, wrestling and lorry driving) in all human activity that upgrade the reflexive with the addition of sedimentary wisdom, human astuteness and recommended practice. They augment us and combine with the personal - in the practical to produce efficacy and in the existential to produce identity. They ought to be regarded with admiration, respect and care.
Okay, so, words, words, words. Another point should be made. We are thus receptive to group intelligence and dysfunctional if we cannot participate in them. This means that there are gateways for them in our mentalities and these gateways can be hacked, especially in those of us unguarded by way of inexperience or complacency, by criminally extractive interests. There are methods to do this through a mixture of brutalism, repetition and persuasion that obscenely mimic the normal acquisition of a group intelligence. The academic literature on these methods only really began on this properly mid C20th and resulted from the mass application of these methods in their modern form during the years leading up to WW1.
There is another point to be made - the clownworld and bizzaro world effects. Those that have been hacked in this way become sterile in their thinking and dissociative in their behaviour. They employ a projective shield to their activities. Thus they become hazardous, even if they are victims in their own right. Uncontrolled they herald a rabid era where the intrinsically pathological are able to hijack identity through social contagion. It is this hijacking of culture that I think that Kennan was warning about in his Long Telegram and that he was so dismayed with later in his life.
It would take courage by him by his barrister and by the judge. None would have the balls.A year or two ago, there was a 50 yo Dutch man who went to court wanting to legally change his age to 30 because he felt 30, absolutely everyone, even rainbow Ukraine flag types mocked and ridiculed him.. But the thing is, Imagine 20 Or 30 years ago, if a man went to court wanting to legally be declared a woman....
CW and Tankman/Jerry run them closeHas Ireland produced a bigger pair of wankers than these two........ever?
I'm sorry mate, I can't read all that sh1t.For Myles
I'm sorry mate, I can't read all that sh1t.
Could you summarise in say two sentences?
Just edit in a few men-in-skirts images randomly throughout the text's and he'll read the lot!!I did! That was the red-pilled part - a sentence put in especially for you. Anyway, I think I'm doing quite well at this tldr craic and I'm not stopping for you, pal.
Who do you think came up with the term (or at least popularised it)?
If you are not a nationalist (the far right, antisemitic, Nazi etc.) and certainly if you are anti-nationalist (as Tucker is), then I think that you are most definitely not red pilled.
This lesbian "white Gaelgeoir" with a TikTik on Irish history, native trees and the environment thinks Gript media are "far right" and thinks "ethno-nationalists" can't be anti-colonial, and blocks people she doesn't like.
Is anti-colonial Palestinian nationalism as much ethno-nationalism as Zionism or Irish Republicanism before the late 90s? Do they have same sex marriage in the Gaza Strip? If they don't does that make them "fascists"? Wasn't the Jewish state of Israel created by mass immigration that she supports for Ireland?
View attachment 2884
Imagine the real world damage these loons are doing. They're stuffed into every profession, every institution. The political and media classes are completely in thrall to their ideology.
Sums it up nicely.Just another lefty moron mind slave completely oblivious to who owns her
Your imagination is getting carried away on a flight of fancy perhaps?Imagine the real world damage these loons are doing.
They're having second thoughts and are now rolling back to sensible perspectives. Things were looking a bit crazy in some cases, for sure.They're stuffed into every profession, every institution. The political and media classes are completely in thrall to their ideology
Symptomatic of the World we live in Today.I've noticed in work recently that it's becoming more common that people emailing us are signing off their mails with he/him or she/her. It's fucking insane.
Society has enough protection - Take it or Leave it will do. Why go further with Punishments.I suggested before that it might be an idea to ship them all to Spike Island to protect wider society
Yet again your imagination is getting carried away, Think about it? Think about the facts?I can only imagine the damage this cult is doing to young impressionable minds.